研究結果不符合預期(不好)，如何撰寫

心中有印象 Dr. Hobart 寫過類似論文
就上PubMed查查
竟發現好多篇，而且發表在很好的期刊：
1. Hagell P, Tornqvist AL, Hobart J. Testing the SF-36 in Parkinson's disease. Implications for reporting rating scale data. J Neurol. 2008;255:246-254.
2. Cano SJ, Thompson AJ, Bhatia K, Fitzpatrick R, Warner TT, Hobart JC. Evidence-based guidelines for using the Short Form 36 in cervical dystonia. Mov Disord. 2007;22:122-126.
3. Baron R, Elashaal A, Germon T, Hobart J. Measuring outcomes in cervical spine surgery: think twice before using the SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2575-2584.
4. Hobart JC, Williams LS, Moran K, Thompson AJ. Quality of life measurement after stroke: uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke. 2002;33:1348-1356.
5. Hobart J, Freeman J, Lamping D, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson A. The SF-36 in multiple sclerosis: why basic assumptions must be tested. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71:363-370.
6. Freeman JA, Hobart JC, Langdon DW, Thompson AJ. Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68:150-156.

難怪是我的 model scholars 之一！